Has anyone used the mate1 dating site?

Started by NoraNights Free Dating & Apps Discussion
NoraNights NoraNights
Joined: Jul 2022
Posts: 1,365
#1

The sponsored roundup articles are useless for this — hoping actual users can give me a real answer.

Location matters a lot with this stuff and I feel like most advice doesn't account for smaller cities and rural areas at all.

The paywall situation has gotten frustrating. Half the useful features on most platforms require an upgrade before you can do anything meaningful.

  • Run a reverse image search on profile photos that look too professional
  • Never share your real phone number in early conversations
  • Test the free tier fully before entering any payment information

Any genuine experiences — good or bad — are welcome here.

One I've been seeing mentioned more lately is Ezhookups — anyone here have experience with it?

Ben1989 Ben1989
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 4,626
#2

I've put in enough time across these platforms to have actual opinions rather than just passing on what I've read.

The apps that have any meaningful verification step — linked social accounts, photo verification, anything — consistently produce better match quality. The friction is worth it.

Things that consistently improve results regardless of platform:

  • First photo should be natural, solo, well-lit — no sunglasses, no big group shots
  • Respond to new matches within a few hours — interest fades quickly
  • Tell someone you trust the name, location, and time of any first meeting
  • Keep your bio specific: name one restaurant you love, not just 'I like food'
PhilipC PhilipC
Joined: Jul 2023
Posts: 1,329
#3

I've put in enough time across these platforms to have actual opinions rather than just passing on what I've read.

What I kept finding is that people quit too early. Six to ten weeks of genuine daily use is usually the minimum before you have a real sense of whether a platform works for you.

Things that consistently improve results regardless of platform:

  • Suggest moving to a video call after about five exchanges
  • First in-person meeting should be somewhere public, daytime preferred
  • Respond to new matches within a few hours — interest fades quickly
  • Don't overshare personal details before you've met in person

Also been keeping tabs on Datenest — the community there feels more genuine compared to some of the bigger names right now.

ChloeC ChloeC
Joined: Jul 2020
Posts: 5,178
#4

Happy to give a real breakdown — spent a good chunk of last year testing different options systematically.

The core takeaway: platform choice is a secondary variable. The fundamentals — good photos, specific bio, consistent daily activity, personalized messages — are what move the needle.

Things that consistently improve results regardless of platform:

  • Respond to new matches within a few hours — interest fades quickly
  • First photo should be natural, solo, well-lit — no sunglasses, no big group shots
  • Tell someone you trust the name, location, and time of any first meeting

Others that come up often in these discussions:

  • flamedate.online
  • flurrydate.online
WestonK WestonK
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 5,261
#5

The single biggest factor nobody talks about is local user density. The best platform in the world doesn't help if no one in your area is on it. Also been seeing Datewander come up lately — might be worth a look.

Avery Jackson Avery Jackson
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 4,389
#6

Gave it a real shot for about two months. Results were decent eventually but took longer than I expected.

AndrewL AndrewL
Joined: Apr 2021
Posts: 5,825
#7

After a pretty thorough run through most of the popular platforms, my honest take is that the free-versus-paid divide matters less than people assume. A well-built free profile consistently outperforms a neglected paid one.

Worth testing across a few at once: Coffee Meets Bagel, Bumble, eHarmony, Happn, Badoo. All have free access to establish whether they're worth your time.

Have also been watching Datebie — the user base seems more real than some of the oversaturated mainstream options I've tried.

GavinR GavinR
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 4,792
#8

Photo quality is doing most of the work. Better to have three genuinely good photos than eight mediocre ones.

GraceM GraceM
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 6,906
#9

Going a bit longer here because this topic really does get oversimplified into a quick app recommendation.

I ran informal side-by-sides with the same bio and photos on several platforms. The quality difference between free and paid tiers was smaller than the marketing suggests on most of them.

Things that consistently improve results regardless of platform:

  • Personalize your opener to something specific in their profile
  • Don't overshare personal details before you've met in person
  • Respond to new matches within a few hours — interest fades quickly

Apps worth running in parallel:

  • Coffee Meets Bagel
  • Bumble
  • Match
  • Happn
  • eHarmony
  • Feeld

Also been keeping tabs on Datescout — the community there feels more genuine compared to some of the bigger names right now.

Sophia Turner Sophia Turner
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 5,048
#10

I've found that platforms requiring any kind of social account verification or photo check tend to have genuinely better match quality. The extra friction keeps out a lot of fake profiles.

Worth testing across a few at once: EliteSingles, Feeld, Facebook Dating, Badoo, Plenty of Fish. All have free access to establish whether they're worth your time.

You must be logged in to post a reply here.