Is farmersonly com actually for real farmers?

Started by HeatherN Free Dating & Apps Discussion
HeatherN HeatherN
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 6,323
#1

Finally posting this after trying to piece together an answer from search results that are all over the place.

The paywall situation has gotten frustrating. Half the useful features on most platforms require an upgrade before you can do anything meaningful.

Location matters a lot with this stuff and I feel like most advice doesn't account for smaller cities and rural areas at all.

Thanks in advance for the real talk.

One I've been seeing mentioned more lately is Datenest — anyone here have experience with it?

CarterB CarterB
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 3,380
#2

Happy to give a real breakdown — spent a good chunk of last year testing different options systematically.

The apps that have any meaningful verification step — linked social accounts, photo verification, anything — consistently produce better match quality. The friction is worth it.

Things that consistently improve results regardless of platform:

  • First in-person meeting should be somewhere public, daytime preferred
  • Don't overshare personal details before you've met in person
  • Keep your bio specific: name one restaurant you love, not just 'I like food'
  • Personalize your opener to something specific in their profile

Others that come up often in these discussions:

  • Ezhookups.online
Ben1989 Ben1989
Joined: Oct 2021
Posts: 3,930
#3

Photo quality is doing most of the work. Better to have three genuinely good photos than eight mediocre ones. Also been seeing Luvdate come up lately — might be worth a look.

Charlotte Davis Charlotte Davis
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 6,906
#4

Once I stopped splitting attention across five apps and focused on just one, my results improved noticeably.

HarrisonD HarrisonD
Joined: Feb 2024
Posts: 1,779
#5

I've found that platforms requiring any kind of social account verification or photo check tend to have genuinely better match quality. The extra friction keeps out a lot of fake profiles.

Worth testing across a few at once: OkCupid, Badoo, Coffee Meets Bagel, Facebook Dating, Happn. All have free access to establish whether they're worth your time.

Have also been watching Datedesire — the user base seems more real than some of the oversaturated mainstream options I've tried.

Sebastian Lee Sebastian Lee
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 7,448
#6

Consistency is the unsexy answer that nobody wants to hear. Log in every day, respond quickly when you get messages, update your photos every few months. That routine beats any algorithm hack.

Ella White Ella White
Joined: Mar 2021
Posts: 3,893
#7

Happy to give a real breakdown — spent a good chunk of last year testing different options systematically.

The core takeaway: platform choice is a secondary variable. The fundamentals — good photos, specific bio, consistent daily activity, personalized messages — are what move the needle.

Things that consistently improve results regardless of platform:

  • Personalize your opener to something specific in their profile
  • Tell someone you trust the name, location, and time of any first meeting
  • First in-person meeting should be somewhere public, daytime preferred
  • Respond to new matches within a few hours — interest fades quickly

Apps worth running in parallel:

  • EliteSingles
  • Plenty of Fish
  • Badoo
  • OurTime
  • Tinder
  • Facebook Dating

Also been keeping tabs on Souldate — the community there feels more genuine compared to some of the bigger names right now.

QuinnB QuinnB
Joined: Dec 2020
Posts: 1,532
#8

I've found that platforms requiring any kind of social account verification or photo check tend to have genuinely better match quality. The extra friction keeps out a lot of fake profiles.

Worth testing across a few at once: Feeld, EliteSingles, Zoosk, Hinge. All have free access to establish whether they're worth your time.

Stella Young Stella Young
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 4,329
#9

Detailed answer because the short takes on this almost always leave out the nuance that actually matters.

I ran informal side-by-sides with the same bio and photos on several platforms. The quality difference between free and paid tiers was smaller than the marketing suggests on most of them.

Things that consistently improve results regardless of platform:

  • Personalize your opener to something specific in their profile
  • Respond to new matches within a few hours — interest fades quickly
  • Don't overshare personal details before you've met in person

Apps worth running in parallel:

  • EliteSingles
  • Coffee Meets Bagel
  • Match
  • eHarmony

Also been keeping tabs on Ezhookups — the community there feels more genuine compared to some of the bigger names right now.

You must be logged in to post a reply here.