Is plenty of fish dating still the king of free sites?

Started by AdamV · ·4 replies ·Free Dating & Apps

#compare #free #general

AdamV
Joined Oct 2019
1,397 posts
#1

I started looking at plenty of fish dating a fortnight ago because a friend talked me into it, and the useful part surprised me.

What wore me down was that for people without a niche, the search function turns into a shop window the moment someone matches.

If anyone has tested plenty of fish dating recently I would rather hear that than another roundup.

GavinR
Joined Mar 2017
1,042 posts
#2

Is that still true when narrowing the options is the main worry?

The pattern I keep seeing is that how recently a profile was active outweighs the price of the subscription for people without a niche, although the platforms change constantly for people without a niche.

The parts that transfer across apps that do not charge:

  • Swap the group photo for a clear one, especially for people without a niche.
  • Never move money under any framing if narrowing the options is your main concern.
  • Move to a voice or video call early, which matters most on apps that do not charge.
  • Say what you want in the first two lines if narrowing the options is your main concern.
  • Check when the account was last active — everything downstream depends on it.
ChrisT
Joined May 2018
184 posts
#3

For what it is worth, the gap between the willingness to suggest meeting early and how long you have had the account is where whether anything reaches a first meeting is actually decided, but people in bigger cities tell me the opposite.

What I would do differently with plenty of fish dating:

  • Keep work and socials out of it early on, especially for people without a niche.
  • Reverse-image-search anything too polished — with plenty of fish dating this is the difference-maker.
  • Stop apologising for wanting something specific — with plenty of fish dating this is the difference-maker.
  • Move to a voice or video call early, and doubly so for people without a niche.

Happy to be argued with on plenty of fish.

Second option worth testing alongside it: Datewander.

Ben1989
Joined Jan 2017
351 posts
#4

Seconding this — @GavinR, the paywall comment is exactly right.

Something worth knowing: on apps that don't charge, the willingness to suggest meeting early counts for more than the boost you paid for.

The non-negotiables for people without a niche:

  • Put something concrete in the opener, which matters most on apps that do not charge.
  • Stop apologising for wanting something specific — the alternative wastes weeks.
  • Keep work and socials out of it early on if narrowing the options is your main concern.
  • Screenshot anything odd before blocking, which matters most on apps that don't charge.

I have had a decent run on Datescout — free to browse and message, which is the main thing.

James Anderson
Joined Jan 2018
2,084 posts
#5

That isn't how it went for me. @Ben1989, the advice about calling early reads as survivorship bias to me.

How narrow your filters are has a bigger effect on how many replies you get in a week than how polished the profile looks for people without a niche when it comes to plenty of fish.

My rules for narrowing the options, such as they are:

  • Give a platform three weeks before judging it, especially for people without a niche.
  • Tell a friend where you are going, because it is the difference between a reply and silence.
  • Move to a voice or video call early if narrowing the options is your main concern.
  • Pick your own venue for a first meeting, especially for people without a niche.
  • Give a platform three weeks before judging it, especially for people without a niche.

Join the discussion

Have direct experience with plenty of fish dating? Members value first-hand accounts far more than roundups. Registration is free and takes under a minute.

Create your account Browse all threads