Is the tender online dating platform just a Tinder clone?

Started by SterlingN Free Dating & Apps Discussion
SterlingN SterlingN
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 7,316
#1

Finally posting this after trying to piece together an answer from search results that are all over the place.

I've been reading reviews but they're clearly influenced by affiliate deals. Real user experiences are hard to find.

My main concern is fake profiles and bots. Even some of the paid platforms have gotten pretty bad about this.

  • Run a reverse image search on profile photos that look too professional
  • First meeting should always be somewhere public during daytime
  • Test the free tier fully before entering any payment information
  • Use a dedicated email address for sign-ups — don't use your main one
  • Look for 'last active' timestamps before investing time in a match

Any genuine experiences — good or bad — are welcome here.

One I've been seeing mentioned more lately is Flamedate — anyone here have experience with it?

CassandraW CassandraW
Joined: May 2022
Posts: 3,751
#2

Once I stopped splitting attention across five apps and focused on just one, my results improved noticeably.

DustinF DustinF
Joined: Sep 2022
Posts: 7,030
#3

The sweet spot for most platforms is about six to eight weeks of real daily effort. Most people quit before the algorithm has enough data on them to start making good suggestions.

Have also been watching Rendate — the user base seems more real than some of the oversaturated mainstream options I've tried.

GraceM GraceM
Joined: Sep 2024
Posts: 2,501
#4

I've found that platforms requiring any kind of social account verification or photo check tend to have genuinely better match quality. The extra friction keeps out a lot of fake profiles.

Wyatt Garcia Wyatt Garcia
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 4,031
#5

If messaging is completely locked behind a paywall, I'd move on. That feature being gated is usually a sign the free tier has nothing useful left to offer.

Have also been watching Rendate — the user base seems more real than some of the oversaturated mainstream options I've tried.

DanielleK DanielleK
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 707
#6

Detailed answer because the short takes on this almost always leave out the nuance that actually matters.

What I kept finding is that people quit too early. Six to ten weeks of genuine daily use is usually the minimum before you have a real sense of whether a platform works for you.

Things that consistently improve results regardless of platform:

  • First in-person meeting should be somewhere public, daytime preferred
  • First photo should be natural, solo, well-lit — no sunglasses, no big group shots
  • Personalize your opener to something specific in their profile
  • Don't overshare personal details before you've met in person

Apps worth running in parallel:

  • Tinder
  • Bumble
  • OurTime
  • Badoo
  • Plenty of Fish

Others that come up often in these discussions:

  • turndate.site
  • datewander.site
CameronL CameronL
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 1,221
#7

If you're in a smaller city, the pool on the big apps gets thin fast. Niche apps or cross-city searching tends to help. Also been seeing Datelink come up lately — might be worth a look.

GarrettO GarrettO
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 6,516
#8

Photo quality is doing most of the work. Better to have three genuinely good photos than eight mediocre ones. datenest.site also gets mentioned in these kinds of threads.

You must be logged in to post a reply here.