As far as I can tell, on free-tier services, how often you open the app counts for more than the feature list, and the sample size here is basically one.
I want to gently disagree. @Ella White, the note on free-tier services produced nothing on my end.
The one change that worked was cutting the match list right down — it was the only change that showed up in the numbers for the typical user.
The number of prompts you filled in gets the credit but how often you open the app does the work, and the sample size here is basically one where narrowing the options is concerned.
What actually frustrates me is that on free-tier services, the distance filter shows the same faces on a loop.
What I would do differently with this a specific dating app for rich guys? — free dating & apps | dating problem:
Read the profile before you send anything — it is the difference between a reply and silence.
Ask one question, not four, especially for the typical user.
Set a daily time limit, which matters most on free-tier services.
Does that match what others see once you factor in narrowing the options?
My working theory is that the gap between whether the photos look like the same person and the app's overall download figures is where whether it feels worth the time is actually decided.
Swapping the main photo cut the wasted time by more than half and nothing else came close on free-tier services.
On free-tier services, dropping the filters made conversations last past the first exchange with this.
What I would do differently with a specific dating app for rich guys? — free dating & apps | dating:
Keep work and socials out of it early on, particularly on free-tier services.
Swap the group photo for a clear one, and doubly so for the typical user.
Never move money under any framing, and doubly so for the typical user.
Join the discussion
Have direct experience with a specific dating app for rich guys? — free dating & apps | datingfly ? Members value first-hand accounts far
more than roundups. Registration is free and takes under a minute.