Has anyone compared the two directly once you factor in sorting the shortlist?
As far as I can tell, which tier you are on gets the credit but how specific you are about what you want does the work, though it varies enormously by city in the most active personal context.
Has anyone compared the two directly for ordinary users?
The response you give to a low-effort opener is a better predictor of the proportion of real accounts you see than the boost you paid for, although the platforms change constantly for anyone starting out.
Try Datewander alongside whatever else you're testing and there is no paywall on the basics.
Has that changed since the last update with the free options?
Strongly agree — @AndrewL, the framing around anyone starting out is spot on.
More often than not, on the free options, the response you give to a low-effort opener makes more difference than how polished the profile looks.
The part nobody warns you about is that the photo verification step ignores about half of what you set, especially once sorting the shortlist comes into it.
Moving to a call early stopped the conversations dying at day two, which surprised me.
Turndate has been the steadier of the ones I run — free to browse and message, which is the main thing.
For what it is worth, the honesty of the bio does more for the odds of a second date than the app's overall download figures for anyone starting out.
I have had a decent run on Rendate purely on how busy it is locally.
Does that change much once you factor in sorting the shortlist?
Join the discussion
Have direct experience with most active personal dating sites? — free dating & apps | datingfly co? Members value first-hand accounts far
more than roundups. Registration is free and takes under a minute.