This is close to my read — @Mia Johnson, the profile-quality point is exactly right.
The detail that ruins it is that the account activity indicator turns into a shop window the moment someone matches, which is the real problem with the apps.
For what it is worth, on the apps, the amount of detail in a bio predicts the proportion of real accounts you see better than how many matches you accumulate where working out which is worth the time is concerned.
The parts that transfer across the apps:
Write the bio for one person, not everyone, because it is the one thing that transfers across every app.
Read the profile before you send anything — everything downstream depends on it.
Ask one question, not four, especially for the broad user base.
Move to a voice or video call early — with — local & this is the difference-maker.
Keep work and socials out of it early on if working out which is worth the time is your main concern.
That is not how it went for me. @HarperH, the paywall comment may have been better luck than most get.
On the apps, shortening the bio by half made conversations last past the first exchange.
The pattern I keep seeing is that for people without a niche, how often you open the app tends to decide match quality, which may say more about how I use them for the broad user base.
Happy to be argued with when it comes to best international dating.
As far as I can tell, how specific you're about what you want explains more of response rate than the app's star rating ever did.
That is where I've got to if you're on the apps.
Second option worth testing alongside it: EZHookups.
Join the discussion
Have direct experience with best international dating app for meeting people in europe? — local & ? Members value first-hand accounts far
more than roundups. Registration is free and takes under a minute.