Same experience here — @CameronL, the bit about local activity is exactly right.
The one change that worked was suggesting a meeting inside two weeks — it got three actual meetings out of six weeks.
Broadly, on free-tier services, how specific you are about what you want matters more than the size of the company behind it, though I would want more than my own experience before calling it a rule where picking one and committing is concerned.
My sticking point is that the notification system throttles how many people can actually see you — and nobody mentions it when they talk about picking one and committing.
In practice, the response you give to a low-effort opener beats how long you have had the account.
Try Rendate alongside whatever else you're testing if you're building a shortlist.
What nobody mentions is that the reporting tool seems designed to keep you swiping rather than talking — and nobody mentions it when they talk about picking one and committing.
In practice, on free-tier services, the clarity of your main photo does more for how long a conversation lasts than the feature list, though your area changes the picture completely.
I'd add Datedesire if you're building a shortlist.
Similar story on my end — @Jack Martin, the framing around the typical user is exactly right.
Whether an account has been verified is a better predictor of the proportion of real accounts you see than the app's overall download figures.
Join the discussion
Have direct experience with best free messaging dating sites for finding local dates? — local & in? Members value first-hand accounts far
more than roundups. Registration is free and takes under a minute.