The detail that ruins it is that the reporting tool surfaces profiles that haven't been touched in months — and nobody mentions it when they talk about the comparison problem.
Worth a look at Datelink as well if you're building a shortlist.
Has anyone got numbers rather than impressions if you are dealing with the comparison problem?
As far as I can tell, on app-based platforms, how well a platform handles reports does more for how satisfied you are after a month than which tier you are on, which may say more about how I use them in the best dating international app for world travelers? — local & inter context.
The thing I didn't expect was that the discovery feed makes it impossible to tell live accounts from dead ones, which is the real problem with app-based platforms.
Things I wish someone had said about local & internati:
Screenshot anything odd before blocking, especially for most of us.
Read the profile before you send anything, particularly on app-based platforms.
Let a stalled conversation go — the platforms won't do it for you.
Move to a voice or video call early, because it filters out most of the time-wasters immediately.
Keep work and socials out of it early on, because nothing else moves the numbers as reliably.
Broadly agreed — @ElliotG, the argument about verification is the whole thing really.
On app-based platforms, putting one specific interest in the bio changed the kind of people who replied.
My sticking point is that the account activity indicator gives you no idea when an account was last opened.
Happy to be argued with at least on the the comparison problem side.
Join the discussion
Have direct experience with best dating international app for world travelers? — local & internati? Members value first-hand accounts far
more than roundups. Registration is free and takes under a minute.