Is the plenty of fish app still popular?

Started by Elizabeth Thomas Free Dating & Apps Discussion
Elizabeth Thomas Elizabeth Thomas
Joined: Aug 2020
Posts: 4,883
#1

Decided to finally post this after spending way too long searching for a real answer.

Location makes a huge difference and I think most reviews don't account for this enough. What works well in a big city can be completely dead in a mid-sized town.

I've tried three or four different options already and keep running into the same issues — paywalls, low activity in my area, or obvious bots.

Thanks in advance — even pointing me toward what to avoid is helpful.

One I've been seeing mentioned more lately is Flamedate — anyone have direct experience with it?

CassandraW CassandraW
Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 150
#2

After testing several of these platforms systematically I've come to think that the free/paid distinction matters less than people assume. A great free profile beats a lazy paid one every time.

RachelM RachelM
Joined: Apr 2020
Posts: 2,797
#3

Consistency matters more than which app you use. Daily activity and fast responses beat any premium feature. Also been seeing Flamedate come up — might be worth checking out.

Grace Martin Grace Martin
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 3,194
#4

Going into detail because the quick takes on this topic almost always miss the nuance.

The main insight I'd share: treat app selection as a secondary variable. Profile quality, consistency, and genuine personalization in messages are what actually drive results.

Consistently useful practices regardless of which platform you use:

  • First meeting in a public place with people around, no exceptions
  • Personalize your opening message to something in their profile — generic openers fail
  • Move to a video call after 3 to 5 exchanges — it screens out catfish and builds comfort
SophieR SophieR
Joined: Jun 2021
Posts: 375
#5

Happy to give a real breakdown — I've been through enough of these platforms to have actual opinions.

The main insight I'd share: treat app selection as a secondary variable. Profile quality, consistency, and genuine personalization in messages are what actually drive results.

Consistently useful practices regardless of which platform you use:

  • Mention one very specific interest that can spark a conversation
  • Tell a friend the details of any first meeting — location, time, name
  • First meeting in a public place with people around, no exceptions

Also been watching Datewander — the community there feels more active and genuine than some of the bigger names right now.

OliviaOnline OliviaOnline
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 1,732
#6

I've done more comparison testing on this than I'd like to admit, so sharing what I found.

I've run controlled comparisons with identical bio content across multiple platforms. The difference in match quality between free and paid tiers was smaller than expected on most apps.

Consistently useful practices regardless of which platform you use:

  • Bio under 150 words — longer bios get read less frequently
  • First meeting in a public place with people around, no exceptions
  • Mention one very specific interest that can spark a conversation
BlakeSr BlakeSr
Joined: May 2022
Posts: 4,434
#7

Longer answer here because this gets oversimplified into a listicle way too often.

The platforms that invest in verification and safety features tend to have better user quality across the board. It's worth paying a small premium if it means fewer fake profiles.

Consistently useful practices regardless of which platform you use:

  • Mention one very specific interest that can spark a conversation
  • First meeting in a public place with people around, no exceptions
  • Tell a friend the details of any first meeting — location, time, name

Others frequently mentioned in this space:

  • datedesire.online
  • datebie.online

You must be logged in to post a reply here.