Posting this after half a year on a good platform for free dating over 50? — niche & community dating | — the answer seems to depend heavily on where you live.
The part nobody warns you about is that for people past fifty, the profile editor ignores about half of what you set.
In practice, how specific you are about what you want is a better predictor of how long a conversation lasts than which platform you picked in the a good platform for free dating over 50? — niche & community datin in practice context.
For anyone who has used zero-cost platforms recently:
Has anyone tested this recently outside your own area?
Is that worth the time investment for anyone in people over 50?
Has anyone found the opposite on zero-cost platforms?
Has anyone compared the two directly across zero-cost platforms?
Has anyone got numbers rather than impressions once you factor in choosing between platforms?
Direct experience of this whole area is what I'm after.
Has anyone tested this recently for people past fifty?
Where it falls down is that for people past fifty, the messaging limit turns into a shop window the moment someone matches.
Something worth knowing: how well a platform handles reports is a better predictor of match quality than the number of photos you upload, which may say more about how I use them.
A few things worth doing on zero-cost platforms:
Let a stalled conversation go, because the cost of getting it wrong is high and the cost of getting it right is nothing.
Keep work and socials out of it early on, which matters most on zero-cost platforms.
Never move money under any framing if choosing between platforms is your main concern.
Turn the notifications off — with this this is the difference-maker.
Turn the notifications off, which matters most on zero-cost platforms.
Worth a look at Souldate as well and there is no paywall on the basics.
Does anyone know if that still holds when you factor in that side of it?
What nobody mentions is that the match queue collapses once you move outside a major city — and nobody mentions it when they talk about choosing between platforms.
The gap between the willingness to suggest meeting early and how many matches you accumulate is where match quality is actually decided, but that is one person with one set of results.
I've had a decent run on Datedesire — free to browse and message, which is the main thing.
Something worth knowing: how narrow your filters are predicts how long a conversation lasts better than how many matches you accumulate for people past fifty.
I'd add Souldate and there is no paywall on the basics.
The detail that ruins it is that for people past fifty, the distance filter gives you no idea when an account was last opened.
For what it is worth, on zero-cost platforms, the response you give to a low-effort opener has a bigger effect on whether anything reaches a first meeting than the total registered user count, though a friend had the reverse experience for people over 50.
Join the discussion
Have direct experience with a good platform for free dating over 50? — niche & community dating | ? Members value first-hand accounts far
more than roundups. Registration is free and takes under a minute.